|
John
McCain and Barack Obama are now wrestling with the weighty decision on a running
mate as they inherit a process that the late political historian Theodore White
described as "absurd." The
basic methodology can be boiled down to one simple truth: It's wholly dependent
on the wishes and whims of the presidential candidate. Sure,
the presidential nominee must be the central decision-maker, but can't the process
provide broader input, and more checks and balances? Here are a few ideas to prompt
discussion: * Place the vice
president's race on the primary ballot. In the spirit of democracy, let the people
decide who should be their party's nominee. *
Establish the tradition that the vice presidential nominee be chosen from candidates
who actively campaigned for president during the primaries. *
Have the presidential and vice presidential candidates run as a ticket for their
party's nomination. * Let
delegates choose freely on the convention floor (Adlai Stevenson did exactly that
at the 1956 Democratic convention). *
Empower the respective national party committees to make the decision. *
Open up the screening process to public view. While some confidentiality is necessary,
there could be a greater degree of public disclosure. The
current method of selecting the person a heartbeat away from the most important
job in the world appears far too arbitrary and capricious. There must be a better
way. ENDING THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE The
bill is gaining momentum. It has been enacted by Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey
and Maryland. It has passed 18 state legislative chambers, including one house
in Arkansas, Colorado, Maine, North Carolina, Rhode Island and Washington, and
both houses in California, Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, Maryland and Vermont.
The bill is currently endorsed by 1,005 state legislators-440 sponsors
(in 47 states) and an additional 565 legislators who have cast recorded votes
in favor of the bill. The National Popular Vote bill would take effect
only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral
votes-that is, enough electoral votes to elect a president (270 of 538). FIGHT FOR FORTY-SOMETHINGS And the Gallup Poll finds McCain
and Obama virtually tied in support among registered voters between the ages of
40 and 49. Forty-something voters are a politically interesting group
because some of the common political divides in the electorate aren't evident
within this particular age group. For example, there's almost no gender gap
in voting preferences among those in their 40s. The Obama and McCain
campaigns will do all they can turn out their solid supporters-which will include
younger voters for Obama and older voters for McCain. But their efforts at persuading
voters may be most fruitful if targeted at middle-aged voters, particularly those
in their 40s. RACE VS. AGE As far
the public is concerned, Obama's race appears to be a wash in terms of perceptions
about his ability to serve effectively as president. But 23% say
McCain would be less effective as a result of his age, while 11% say he would
be more effective. The net result is a slightly negative view of the impact
of McCain's advanced age. FOUR-LEGGED POLL This is a huge demographic. The American
Pet Product Manufacturers Association estimates that 63% of American homes include
a pet, including 88 million cats and 75 million dogs. Both of those
groups lean toward McCain: 43% to 34% for dog owners and 41% to 38% for cat owners. McCain
has a veritable menagerie of pets, including Sam, the English springer spaniel;
Coco, the mutt; turtles Cuff and Link; Oreo, the black and white cat; a ferret;
three parakeets; and a bunch of saltwater fish. While he doesn't currently
have a pet, Obama has promised his daughters a dog once the campaign is over. BARBECUE POLL By 52% to 45%, they would prefer having Obama over
McCain to their summer cookout, according to an AP-Yahoo! News poll. This
is despite the fact that the Arizona Senator is supposed to be pretty talented
over the grill. FIGHT FOR CONGRESS Among
voters who see economic issues as the most important in the upcoming election,
58% would vote Democratic while just 25% would vote Republican. A separate national
survey found that the economy is a very important issue to 81% of voters. THE PROJECTION FACTOR GWU
professor Bill Adams' research says no. Adams concludes that projections
don't damage voter turnout and that the real issue is the less tangible one of
equity and fairness. Indeed his focus groups in Los Angeles, Orange County,
San Diego, Seattle and Portland, confirmed the hostility of Western voters toward
early projections and their anger at feeling their votes are devalued by projections.
Read his Election Night News and Voter Turnout: Solving the Projection
Puzzle for a detailed analysis. HAPPY 100! As part of the
celebration, "Movies Under the Stars" are being shown at the LBJ Ranch
this summer, carrying on a tradition enjoyed by the Johnson family, friends, and
neighbors in the late 1960s. AND HAPPY 75! The drive-in concept didn't really get traction until the
advent of in-car speakers in the early 1940s. By 1958, the number of drive-ins
peaked at 4,063. Today some 400 drive-ins remain in the U.S., a
number that hasn't changed much in the past five years. Interestingly, drive-ins
are suddenly becoming popular in China. DOES PHILANTHROPY PAY? SAVE THE SHARKS Is it time for a movie remake? CODE NAME QUIZ
Answers: 1=b, 2=d, 3=e, 4=a, 5=c Return
to Stratagems Main Menu Site
maintained by |